Measuring Construction progress with EVM, is it enough?

         A. Earned Value Management (EVM) 

It is very common in measuring construction progress. However, does it give accurate information about the progress? Let us see the following example of measuring the progress using the EVM:

In the above picture we have a project with a value of 9,772,453, the earned value so far according to the progress is 6,678 which represents 0.07 %

B.    Working hours

Now, if we changed the measuring reference from money to working hours, does it make a difference? See the photo below where we replaced the rate (money) with the productivity rate (working hours per unit) and accordingly, the amount was replaced by hours.

In the above picture, we have a project with a budget hour 120,000 the earned hours so far according to the progress is 127 which represents 0.11 %

 Although, it is the same project with the same progress the planned % and actual % would vary depending on the benchmark or the technique you use to measure the progress (EVM or HRS).

Here is another sample of construction project update with the two criteria mentioned above showing different planned and actual.

Which measurement criteria is correct?

In my opinion, you should use both in your reporting. Following is a table showing the advantages and disadvantages of each progress measurement technique:

RECOMMENDED COURSE

Cost Control for Construction Projects

Course WhatsApp Support Group All enrolled trainees get an invitation to the course WhatsApp support group, where our team answers your questions…

• 811 students
• WhatsApp support group
• Certificate

View course

1.     Measuring Construction progress Techniques

A.     Earned Value Management (EVM)

·       Advantages

·   Easy to implement.

·   Well understood by the clients.

·   Project Budget Cost is known in the contract so no disputes about the benchmark.

·   Can be verified by comparing Earned Value to Payment Certificate Value.

·       Disadvantages

·   Could result in misleading results if the project cost is upfronted (contractor adds more money to the activities which will start early to maintain cash flow).

·   Could result in misleading results if there is an activity with a very high value compared to other activities.

B.     Man Hours (HRS)

·       Advantages

·   Gives accurate information about the project status based on the required working hours and earned hours.

·   The same data could be used to manage resources in the construction site.

·   Help the cost control department to monitor the project cost performance.

·       Disadvantages

·   Requires accurate estimation of manpower required hours for each activity.

·   Since total hours are estimated by the contractor based on company productivity rates, the client could argue about the productivity rates/total working hours. 

2.     Conclusion:

What you cannot measure you cannot manage. Therefore, finding the proper progress measurement technique should be the first step in any construction project management. However, having EVM alone as a progress measurement system would return misleading values. Therefore, I would recommend using both EVM and Man Hours as progress measurement and reporting systems.

Download the Resources of this Article

Measuring Construction progress with EVM, is it enough? 305.44 KB 7300 downloads

This File is included in the following course(s)

Intermediate, Professional Planning

---

Keep in Touch

Join our Email Newsletters and receive FREE weekly useful content!

Your Name

Email

---

Related posts:

Understanding Merge Hotspot, Diverge Hotspot, and Logic Hotspot in Project Scheduling How to Filter the Delayed Activities for a Milestone in Primavera P6 Qatar is the best country in salary for Junior Planning Engineers Why Project management and project management plan PMP Exam Tips You Should Know